User Experience

First, let’s talk about user experience. Avoma like many other providers is working from an internet browser, having to jump between applications during the meeting. Costing you time in your meetings instead of focusing on it. isLucid works in the side panel of Microsoft teams, so you could see transcription, create tasks and see your colleagues without any need to shuffle through applications.

Transcription

While many competitors only are able to provide transcription only after the meeting. isLucid is doing transcription in real-time, as you are doing your daily tasks and talking to your colleagues. While Avoma lacks real-time transcription, yet it supports audio/video playback at any time after the meeting, for post-meeting review. Both isLucid and Avoma are quite good, with separate different people speaking at the same time. Yet when people are talking one over another, isLucid takes the upper hand and can do it with zero possibility of intruding transcriptions quality.

Security

What can be more important than the security of information we are discussing during the meetings.  Every single isLucid client has its own data isolated and encapsulated from other clients. Guest participants have no access to your document and transcription, tasks. If you require the most security possible, isLucid can deploy the solution to your Azure, to have all documents and transcription within your servers.

Compliance

Speak of administration and compliance to each other. The Lucid is available user-based permissions, get a notification for attendees about registration and hold to use the application for the user. The Avoma only gives the user permission to use based on the number of licenses purchased.

Integration

The main difference between Software Integration is the audio recording for playback using Dropbox. IsLucid has possibilities to perform every task or assignment for software like Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, or Azure DevOps, but both platforms cannot use integration by API.